AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT review | PC Gamer - fishmandiffeclus
Our Verdict
In an alternating universe, without the current silicon drought, AMD's RX 6600 XT is to a lesser degree $300 and a enceinte middle-range option. In this, the darkest timeline, it's almost $400, negligibly quicker than an RX 5700 Crosstalk and only slightly cheaper. Though at to the lowest degree it's better than the RTX 3060.
For
- Comfortably quicker than an RTX 3060
- Superbly efficient RDNA 2 architecture
- Stable at 2.7GHz when overclocked
Against
- The better RTX 3060 Ti is lonesome $20 more
- Doesn't move the game along from the RX 5700 XT
PC Gamer Finding of fact
In an alternate universe, without the topical silicon drouth, AMD's RX 6600 XT is to a lesser degree $300 and a great middle-range selection. In this, the darkest timeline, it's almost $400, negligibly quicker than an RX 5700 XT and only somewhat cheaper. Though at least it's better than the RTX 3060.
Pros
- +
Comfortably quicker than an RTX 3060
- +
Superbly efficient RDNA 2 architecture
- +
Stable at 2.7GHz when overclocked
Cons
- -
The better RTX 3060 Ti is only $20 more
- -
Doesn't move the game on from the RX 5700 XT
"The ultimate 1080p gambling experience," that's what AMD is calling its $379 Radeon RX 6600 XT graphics notice. And I'm active to suggest that's possibly a tough sell. It's clear that AMD is aiming at phratr wishing to hit triple figure frame rates in competitive shooters at 1080p, specifically those World Health Organization are willing to spend significant amounts of cash doing so. Righteous not the sort of significant digit that would get you a significantly better nontextual matter bill of fare.
That feels like a niche audience when your recent generation's most affordable GPU is traditionally meant to be the i which targets the broadest mountain chain of PC gamers possible.
These are not traditional times, however, and trying to use recent history to inform opinions on newly released graphics cards almost feels like a take in's errand right now. Admittedly, so does talking about such ephemeral concepts as a $379 MSRP, especially in sexual intercourse to the hourlong-forgotten suggested retail pricing of existing cards. That's something which has long since ceased to have any meaning in the real world.
Just forming the bottommost rung of the RDNA 2 GPU ladder, the Radeon RX 6600 XT is the fifth tier pick over of AMD's current graphics posting generation. And the fact IT's a nigh-along $400 GPU—when that was the price of the old contemporaries's top Radeon card—probably tells you a lot about the graphics card food market right directly.
AMD is agonistical again, and no thirster has to solely bank on undercutting its Nvidia GeForce rival's top cards. But we'Ra also at a point in account where pretty much all GPU that sack be manufactured is guaranteed to be sold, and sold for well above its market value. Nevertheless much AMD and its partners would like to suggest there bequeath make up enough silicon out thither to keep sales around this calling card's explicit MSRP, the likeliness is the RX 6600 XT will still trade out retributive as quickly Eastern Samoa all the different GPUs released in the last year, and potentially for similarly steep sums of money.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT specifications
What are the Radeon RX 6600 Crosstalk specs?
Which almost makes public lecture almost the actual specifications of a particular chip, operating theater even its real-human race functioning, feel sympathetic of pointless. Yes, there is a definite malaise setting certain us humble GPU reviewers these days, and I am sure enough not immune.
But let's do this: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT features the new Navi 23 GPU; united of the latest second-gen Navi chips based on the earnestly impressive RDNA 2 architecture. It's another TSMC N7 (7nm) graphics processor, but the smallest of wholly the current-gen AMD GPUs. Despite its small surmount, though, it packs in more transistors than smooth the almost superhuman of the first generation Navi cards, the Navi 10 chip at the marrow of the RX 5700 XT.
Radeon RX 6600 XT specs
GPU: Navi 23
Lithography: TSMC 7nm
Transistors: 11.1B
Pelt Processors: 2,048
CUs: 32
Ray Accelerators: 32
GPU Game Clock (MHz): 2,359
Memory bus: 128-bit
Retentiveness capacity: 8GB GDDR6
Memory hurrying: 16Gbps
Memory bandwidth: 256GB/s
TBP: 160W
Recommended power supply: 500W
Price: $379
When IT comes to speeds and feeds we'ray talking approximately a chip with 32 compute units (CUs) at its heart, with a total of 2,048 stream processors making upwards those RDNA 2 dual-CU workgroups. If you require a chockablock rundown of how the RDNA 2 computer architecture is able to make graphics cards able to keep step with Nvidia's finest, then check out Jacob's excellent Radeon RX 6800 XT review.
1 of the keys to the latest architectural design is the way AMD's engineers have been able to push its efficient atomic number 14 faster than any GPUs we've seen before. This center on raw relative frequency was part of the unconscious process which made succeeding Ryzen CPU generations so good, and it's an approach that has been working to great effectuate with AMD's modish graphics chips overly.
That's made abundantly clear through with the speeds of the RX 6600 XT. The 'game clock' of the latest card, essentially the anticipated time speed under gambling loads, is a heady, and strangely specific 2,359MHz. Compare that with the 1,755MHz of the antiquated RX 5700 XT and you tooshie clearly see the progress AMD has made. Nvidia's Ampere silicon is seldom able to capture just about the 2GHz mark, and this is cardinal of the core reasons as to why AMD has been able to contiguous the opening 'tween it and its rivals' top cards.
Thereupon extremely high frequency in mind, the efficiency of the RDNA 2 computer architecture should constitute translucent when you compare the totality board power (TBP) of the RX 6600 XT at 160W vs. that of the RX 5700 Crosstalk at 225W.
IT is worth noting that the XFX RX 6600 XT Merc 308 card we have sure review is able to hit an median 2,516MHz under normal gaming operations, and was even steady with an average 2,731MHz when overclocked. A 2.7GHz clock hotfoot is pretty a lot unprecedented in GPU footing outside of the LN2-sniffing overclocking push.
It's fair a ignominy that kinda frequency bump doesn't actually translate into more an extra duet fps here and on that point for your trouble.
With that it's also worth noting that, like with the Nvidia RTX 3060, you won't find citation model versions of AMD's fashionable GPU. That's why we've got the XFX card here, rather than the sort of pleasingly chonky black and grey reference numbers we've had for the Radeon RX 6700 XT et al.
But the Navi GPU Si itself isn't the whole cope with AMD's a la mode cards, the memory subsystem is utterly key, specially down at this end of the stack. Compared with the rest of the RX 6000-series cards that have already been free, and the last-gen RX 5000-serial, we're looking at at a memory bus usually reserved for cards lower shoot down the ladder.
With 8GB of 16Gbps GDDR6 arrayed across an aggregate 128-bit bus you'd normally expect the GPU to be starved of memory bandwidth, and while IT's certainly lower than either the 448GB/s of the RX 5700 XT or the 288GB/s of the RX 5600 XT, its 256GB/s figure doesn't look too bad.
But that's without taking into account the RDNA 2 magic bullet of Infinity Cache. This is a supplementary, die-adorned cut of speedy cache memory, that will intercept a bundle of calls that would otherwise have to go through the PCIe bus to memory pools outside of the card itself. With something like the RX 6800 XT, and its healthy chunk of 128MB of Infinity Cache, and an already high retention bandwidth, this duplicate cache is partly causative its 4K functioning.
With the RX 6600 XT, even so, Infinity Cache ought to be arguably to a greater extent epoch-making. AMD same, when it introduced the newfangled RDNA 2 design, that squirrel away hits are most equiprobable at 1080p, though at that resolution you'ray less likely to run into issues with memory bandwidth connected higher-specification menu. The RX 6600 XT, however, is already bad restricted in terms of bandwidth, then the geometrical regularity of cache hits at its target resoluteness should skilled the extra effective bandwidth boost of Infinity Cache will be a truthful boon for its narrow 128-routine busbar.
Though that's tempered by the fact in that location is only a preferably paltry 32MB of this carrying into action-salving memory cache available to the in style AMD card, however.
So there's shaft of light tracing. Which, let's be honest, you don't rattling care about if you're purchasing an AMD graphics card.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT public presentation
How does the Radeon RX 6600 XT execute?
There are no real surprises here, which itself isn't much of a surprise.
The further you get into a new architectural generation of art carte du jour the more it becomes a famed quantity and you can near foretell the performance park of subsequent iterations of GPU. When looking at relative 3DMark Time Spy Extreme GPU numbers—flatter line from RX 6900 XT to RX 6800 XT by—the slew is almost completely lengthways through the residue of the iv Radeon cards.
There is much more variation, for good or ill, when you take the Green Line of GeForce 3DMark lashing.
For the RX 6600 XT itself, the good intelligence is that IT confidently beats Nvidia's cheapest Ampere GPU, the RTX 3060, across the board. That was a card we were initially keen along around establish, but its shininess is maybe tiring off. Nevertheless, information technology's the most affordable 'next-gen' GPU right now, which is leastways something.
On the otherwise hand, the RX 6600 XT falls unawares of the pace of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is looking ever more like the card of this current genesis.
AMD RX 6600 XT 1080p gaming performance
The best showing for the newest Navi GPU is at its 1080p target resolution. That's generally been the casing for AMD's cards compared to their Nvidia competition this time around. With the RX 6600 Crosstalk it's some 15% slower on average than the nominally $20 Thomas More expensive Nvidia card at this reticuloendothelial system, though that performance delta quickly grows you shift gears to 1440p and so happening to 4K.
If you're sporting a higher resolution monitor, operating theater just want to come yourself those high 1080p frame rates in competitive shooters that AMD seems to be aiming its recent notice, past that $20 disbursal starts to take care increasingly the like money well spent on the RTX 3060 Cordyline terminalis.
AMD RX 6600 XT 1440p gaming performance
AMD RX 6600 XT 4K gaming performance
AMD RX 6600 XT ray tracing performance
Test rig
Processor - Intel Core i7 10700K
Motherboard - MSI MPG Z490 Gaming Carbon WiFi
Random access memory - Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro @ 3,200MHz
CPU cooler - Corsair H100i RGB Pro Crosstalk
PSU - NZXT 850W
Anatomy - DimasTech Miniskirt V2
Monitor - Eve Spectrum
The efficient GPU at the heart of the RX 6600 XT, coupled with the impressive triple lover cooler offered by XFX's Merc 308 edition, means that this review card remains super chill even under free burning load. To be clean, it's not like RTX 3060 Ti with its Founders Edition shroud is peculiarly toasty, but even when cranking up the clock speed of the RX 6600 XT it never stone-broke the 70°C mark, which is supremely impressive.
In terms of power, too, the RDNA 2 architecture shows its class. Despite regularly outshining the RTX 3060 in terms of open gambling performance it also does so with both a significantly lower average power draw and lower peak overly.
AMD RX 6600 XT magnate and thermals
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT analysis
How does the Radeon RX 6600 XT heap up?
For most of this GPU generation, and for a evidential part of the live on, the regular refrain has been that tender execution numbers game are one matter, merely Nvidia has a serious edge in terms of the unscheduled features. Patc real-time ray tracing has been touted as the biggest, realistically it's the almost-identical-from-magic Deep Learnedness Super Sample (DLSS) tech that has garnered more industry plaudits.
Delivering higher gaming performance with a barely perceptible impact connected modality faithfulness has long been something Nvidia is rightly pleased. And information technology's been something that has regularly been the differentiating factor 'tween recommending an Nvidia posting over an AMD one.
But AMD now has a pool of features with its recent Radeon cards that, while they maybe rump't quite play off aweigh to their GeForce equivalents, provide a good value-add on transcend of the lowly frame rate levels of its GPUs. King of those is FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). It is held up as AMD's answer to DLSS, though IT is a very different matter, it can avail you get higher draw up rates in pick out games, without being in particular punitive when it comes to the look of your game.
We're big fans of it, and while it's not as snazzy a solution as DLSS, it will tranquilize deliver to a greater extent performance and look pretty great while doing so. That's a definite win for a middle-browse card such as the RX 6600 XT.
Though FSR looks a bit underrepresented when it comes to game tolerate, AMD's assure that information technology's easy for devs to implement has been born out by purposeful modders descending FSR the feature into different games, such as GTA V and Skyrim VR, themselves. Some sustain even created apps that allow you to add it into much any Windows or Vulkan game.
Then there's Radeon Opposing-Lag and Radeon Boost, now with a variable rate shading promote in certain titles, which are both designed to deliver the slickest gaming performance in competing games where milliseconds can be the difference between life and death.
And the Adrenaline driver software isn't so awkward to use anymore either. The drivers themselves birth been on a regular basis improving o'er the years, but that actual software is now joining it. Obviously there are whatever issues, like strange hardware recommendations, and settings being buried and needlessly obfuscated inside Russian doll menus, but it feels far more solid than it has in a patc.
But this improved AMD parcel doesn't change the fact that I'd mirthfully pay the extra $20 that would theoretically get me the more performant Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti over the AMD RX 6600 XT. In bleak performance damage it's the quicker GPU, and so you can add the green team's possess impressive characteristic assail top of that.
Which makes the pricing of this plug-in my biggest frustration. At $379 it's obviously far too expensive for what it is, and what it represents. But AMD has been laser-focused on boosting the average marketing price of its components, and the GPU shortage has now given it rich opportunity to do so with its Radeon graphics cards.
At that place was a real gamble here to stick it to Nvidia and either check or beat the price of the RTX 3060, in which lawsuit we'd embody single mentioning the proportional power of the RTX 3060 Te card in passing, not direction on information technology. What makes that doubly frustrating is that, with some RX 6600 XT cards ever likely to Be sold at the MSRP, AMD could hardly atomic number 3 easy have plucked a cheaper price out of the air and basked in the goodwill that generated. Instead it's sounding overpriced up against the entirely slimly more expensive, and quicker Nvidia GPU.
It's also not same the RX 6600 XT is genuinely moving things along any either. IT's practically the same price equally the RX 5700 XT, and only single digit figures faster on medium. Taking our uncastrated benchmarking suite into account, this new card delivers average 1080p frame rates sole 7% higher than the first-gen Navi card, spell only being 5% cheaper than the RX 5700 XT's $399 MSRP.
The new GPU is more efficient, with significantly frown power consumption, and definitely a more technically elegant solution, though that doesn't make a large difference in terms of actual temperatures or performance. I can absolutely say the RDNA 2 computer architecture is certainly a better technology than its RDNA 1 forebear, but the in-game results in this case are barely any different.
Though if I just say the fifth tier of this latest generation of AMD nontextual matter card game effectively matches the form rate performance of the scoop of the previous generation, and then things look pretty chromatic. But when you consider they're some the same price that doesn't really flavor like a lot of mainstream work up to Pine Tree State.
Remember when there were capital $250 graphics cards in all coevals? Seems like a long time past now. And with the GPU shortfall foreseen to subterminal for at the least another twelvemonth, it seems like a long way to go from where we are now, too. Neither AMD or Nvidia are likely to dip their toes into that traditionally high-volume mainstream level when every higher-priced graphics card is organism sold anyway.
Why supply cheaper cards, when the thirst forsimply anything is so insatiable?
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT verdict
Should you buy the Radeon RX 6600 XT?
The new AMD RX 6600 XT is a art card in 2021, which means two things: IT's MSRP wish be ephemeral at best, and all single one factory-made will be sold anyhow. Quickly.
When it comes to gaming performance the RX 6600 XT is an excellent 1080p GPU, just as the RX 5700 XT was, and honestly alike any warm-$400 graphics card has been in any generation of the survive five old age. Really that should represent a given, and we should at least be looking to energy high refresh rate monitors at 1440p when we'atomic number 75 outlay this overmuch cash on a GPU.
It well beats the RTX 3060, which I guess is the point, just IT's nominally $50 more than. Though it's pretty well off the pace compared with the RTX 3060 Ti which costs exclusive another $20. With that card's higher resolution performance, the magic of DLSS, and Nvidia's generally greater availability, that's where my good word lies right now.
The positioning and pricing of the RX 6600 XT seems out of touch with the rest of the GPU market. But that's when we're talking about relative MSRP's, which, in the up-to-the-minute atomic number 14-starved state of the industry, are almost utterly irrelevant.
At any other time on that point would be some last-gen cards shut up floating around in retail, and if there were any RX 5700 XTs still out there priced normally the RX 6600 XT would sustain a very different launch price. But, in this darkest timeline, in that respect aren't.
And that's why AMD can price its new card so high, and still constitute confident that it'll deal out out almost forthwith.
XFX Radeon RX 6600 XT Merc 308
In an alternate universe, without the new atomic number 14 drought, AMD's RX 6600 XT is less than $300 and a great middle-range pick. In this, the darkest timeline, it's almost $400, negligibly quicker than an RX 5700 XT and only somewhat cheaper. Though at the least IT's better than the RTX 3060.
Dave has been gaming since the days of Zaxxon and Lady Bug on the Colecovision, and code books for the Commodore Vic 20 (Last Wash 2000!). Helium improved his first play PC at the tender eld of 16, and finally finished hemipterous insect-fixing the Cyrix-based system around a year later. When he dropped it out of the window. Helium first of all started penning for Formal PlayStation Magazine and Xbox World many decades ago, then moved onto Personal computer Format regular, then PC Gamer, TechRadar, and T3 among others. Right away helium's back, written material about the nightmarish nontextual matter card market, CPUs with to a greater extent cores than sensory faculty, gaming laptops hotter than the sun, and SSDs more than big than a Cybertruck.
Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt-review-xfx-merc-308-benchmarks/
Posted by: fishmandiffeclus.blogspot.com
0 Response to "AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT review | PC Gamer - fishmandiffeclus"
Post a Comment